Amelia E. Talley
Texas Tech University
Mackenzie A. Cook
Catherine A. Schroy
Texas Ladies’ University
Utilizing ladies’ self-identified intimate identification, the present research compares motivations for very very first same-sex intimate encounters also linked experiential results. We also examine whether relations between intimate motivations and experiential results vary as a function of females’s intimate identification status. Individuals had been females (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex intimate contact. More or less 27% of females defined as solely heterosexual (in other words., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (in other words., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (for example., LGB). Individuals finished a paid survey. MH and LGB ladies reported very very first same-sex intimate encounters which were more inspired by intimacy and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB ladies, EH additionally involved with less intimate tasks with regards to very first same-sex partner. Intimacy and exploration motives had been associated with good experiential results during very very first same-sex contact. Associations between motivations and outcomes that are experiential maybe maybe maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings subscribe to understanding motivations and experiences pertaining to ladies’ very very very very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that only a few females with a brief history of same-sex intimate contact later determine with a minority intimate identification label.
Humans take part in sexual intercourse for many different reasons and, essential for the approach that is motivational understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are considered to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sexuality (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The particular reasons motivating sexual intercourse, including same-sex activity, can mirror a person’s wider approach or avoidance orientations ( e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that are theorized become associated with distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). As an example, present findings declare that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the motivation value related to petite blowjob various risk-taking behavior (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and intimate stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Ferrey et al., 2012) and can even have broad affect psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Impett et al., 2008).
The significance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex activity that is sexual self-evident. This knowledge has got the prospective to tell basic research examining facets that motivate adolescents’ and teenagers’ research of varied intimate destinations and impulses and fundamentally notify their self-identification with a specific sexual identification (i.e., intimate identity development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The present work additionally has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative consequences ( ag e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for folks with distinct underlying motivations for intercourse that may potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( e.g., intercourse intoxicated by medications or alcohol).
Although initial sexual encounters could have lasting effect on subsequent sexual intercourse and development ( e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic contrast of teenagers’ subjective connection with and motivations for his or her initial intimate encounters predicated on their self-identified intimate identification, no matter their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet become carried out. A person’s intimate identification is informed by different facets of their sex, including their self-labeling ( ag e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) in addition to their attraction toward and engagement in sex with lovers of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) declare that self-labeling of your intimate identification is of main value in contemplating and one that is defining intimate orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed identity that is sexual viewed as “primary over present and previous experience which may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).